EndpointRadar is reader-supported. Some links on this site are affiliate links — if you sign up through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This never affects what we write.Learn more
EndpointRadar

Comparison · Last reviewed 2026-08-01

PDQ Deploy vs Automox: Windows-Only Deployment vs Cross-OS Patch & Config

PDQ Deploy focuses on Windows software deployment. Automox is built for patching and configuration across Windows, macOS, and Linux. Here's how they compare.

Feature sets change frequently for both products. This comparison reflects each vendor's generally published positioning — verify current specifics directly with each vendor before making a purchasing decision.

Executive summary

If your fleet is entirely Windows, PDQ Deploy and Automox both cover the core use case, but from different angles — PDQ Deploy via direct package deployment, Automox via policy-driven patch and configuration automation. The bigger differentiator shows up in mixed environments: Automox is built to manage Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints from one console, which PDQ Deploy — a Windows-only tool — simply doesn't address.

Side-by-side

CriteriaPDQ DeployAutomox
Deployment modelOn-prem console, agentless push (SMB)Cloud-native, agent-based
OS coverageWindows onlyWindows, macOS, and Linux (per Automox's published coverage)
Patch managementVia package deployment workflowBuilt-in cross-OS patch and configuration policies
Network requirementOn-network or VPN for classic DeployCloud agent — no VPN required
Companion inventory toolPDQ Inventory (separate product)Built into the core platform
Pricing modelFree tier + paid license tiersPer-endpoint subscription — verify current tiers

Choose PDQ Deploy if…

  • Your environment is Windows-only and likely to stay that way.
  • You want direct control over installer packages rather than a policy engine.
  • You're comfortable running and maintaining on-prem management infrastructure.

Choose Automox if…

  • You manage a mixed-OS fleet spanning Windows, macOS, and Linux.
  • You want patching and configuration hardening handled through unified policies.
  • You'd rather not operate on-prem deployment infrastructure.

Migration considerations

If you're consolidating onto Automox specifically to bring macOS or Linux endpoints under the same tool as Windows, plan for separate validation work per OS — scripts and detection logic that work on Windows won't transfer to Unix-like systems, so each platform needs its own testing pass before a production rollout.

FAQ

Does Automox support macOS and Linux?

Yes, per Automox's published product coverage — this is one of its core differentiators from Windows-only tools. Confirm current OS version support directly with Automox for your specific fleet.

Is Automox agent-based?

Yes. Automox relies on an installed agent on each managed endpoint, unlike classic PDQ Deploy's agentless push model.